Instructions for Students:

Welcome to the Lesson 6 Peer Review and Ethical Q&A Hub. Before you officially submit your final campaign blueprint for grading, you must pass through peer validation and address the core ethical dilemmas of your launch.

This forum is divided into two mandatory execution tracks:

Track 1: The Peer Review Stress-Test

1. Post Your Draft: Create a new discussion topic and paste the overview of your complete NFT advocacy campaign plan (include your targeted policy milestone, your multi-sig setup, and your short-form pitch video script/link).

2. Review Your Peers: You are required to review at least two of your classmates' drafts. In your replies, look for vulnerabilities using our ethical matrix:

   • Is their data truly public (IPFS linked), or is it vulnerable to greenwashing?

   • Are they using high-pressure FOMO tactics, or is their communication ethical?

   • Is their technical onboarding accessible for everyday local citizens?

Track 2: The Live Ethical Gray Areas 

Reply to the pinned thread regarding "Launch Day Dilemmas" and share your perspective on one of the following scenarios:

• Scenario A: If a high-net-worth speculator tries to buy up 50% of your solidarity badges to flip them for profit on OpenSea, what operational adjustments should you make to protect your local community’s voice?

• Scenario B: How do you balance the need for radical financial transparency on the ledger with the physical safety and privacy of local activists on the ground?

Evaluation Metric: You must author 1 original post (your draft) and submit at least 2 constructive, ethically-grounded reviews to your peers to clear this participation milestone.